21 people currently viewing this page
A Research Report · April 2026

Hospitality In the AI Discovery Era.

Travel discovery is moving from search engines to AI assistants. This report analyses 16,295 hospitality videos across TikTok and Instagram to answer a single question: what does AI actually see when a creator talks about a hotel — and what does it miss?

16,295 videos 2.83B views 10,883 creators Oct 2025 – Apr 2026 TikTok + Instagram
Danielle Barich
By Danielle Barich
Consultant · Luxury · Sensory · Tech · Hospitality
Apr 2026
16,295 Videos Analysed after hospitality filter
2.83B Total Views 174K avg per video
84.2% Shadow Reach views invisible to text-only AI
15.1% AI-Citable score 5–6 out of 6
10,883 Unique Creators organic + sponsored
The Insight · Your social content is not being found by AI or your social teams

When creators say “hotel”,
AI never hears them.

84.2%
of hospitality views live in spoken audio only

Of the 2.83 billion views in this dataset, 2.39 billion (84.2%) came from videos where the words “hotel”, “resort”, or a brand name were spoken aloud but never written in the caption. AI models cannot read spoken audio. This is the structural reason AI gets hospitality recommendations wrong: the evidence it needs is sitting in 13,000 videos it cannot parse.

12,985
Spoken-Only Videos
79.7% of the corpus
3,056
Spoken + Captioned
18.8% — the only AI-readable slice
0.3%
Caption-Only
45 videos · creators rarely only write
01 / Methodology

The AI-Legibility Scorecard

Every video was scored out of 6 on signals that determine whether a Large Language Model can understand, attribute, and cite it.

Six binary dimensions — each either present or absent across the video’s spoken words and caption combined. The result: only 15.1% of hospitality videos score high enough to be cited by an AI assistant. The remaining 84.9% exist in what we call the shadow reach — seen by humans, invisible to machines.

The single biggest lever? Caption completeness. Only 28.3% of hospitality videos have a caption of 50+ characters that mentions a hotel or location. This is the gap AI cannot bridge without human input.

AI legibility score distribution · 16,295 videos
0
91
1
1,489
2
4,698
3
4,451
4
3,109
5
1,840
6
617
0–2: AI-illegible (38.5%)
3–4: Partially legible (46.4%)
5–6: AI-citable (15.1%)
02 / The Paradox

Viral. But invisible.

The highest-reach hospitality content is the least AI-legible. Creators driving the biggest views are writing the lightest captions. The key is not ignoring the algorithm for human views, but by also ensuring viral content is captured by AI for a larger reach.

Viral but Invisible
5,555
videos
1.93B views
High views, low AI score. Big cultural moments AI will never cite.
The Sweet Spot
2,584
videos
791M views
Viral AND legible. What every brand brief should optimise for.
Ignored
5,174
videos
74M views
Low views, low AI score. Algorithm-buried AND AI-invisible.
AI-Ready, Under-Seen
2,982
videos
42M views
High AI score, low views. AI cites these even when humans skip them.
1.24B
views that went viral but cannot be cited by AI.

3,281 videos scored 0–2 on the legibility scorecard AND crossed 32K views. These are the hospitality moments that trended on For You Pages and never showed up in an LLM response. When a hotel’s most-watched TikTok has a 6-word caption, the view counter goes up and the LLM goes blind.

03 / Brand Coverage

Who AI can find.

Our data covered over 10 major hospitality brands, however here we focus on the AI legibility score vs. video volume of four key players. What we found? More videos does not mean more AI attribution. The data on the Four Seasons shows they lead on volume but score below peers because creators rarely name them in captions.

AI legibility score (out of 6) & video count · selected luxury brands
Four Seasons
Video volume (806 = max)
806 videos · 128.1M views
2.8/6
AI Legibility
10.4%caption
agreement
Aman
Video volume (806 = max)
174 videos · 24.6M views
3.4/6
AI Legibility
2.16%avg
eng. rate
Six Senses
Video volume (806 = max)
33 videos · 1.6M views
3.8/6
AI Legibility
4.27%avg
eng. rate
Belmond
Video volume (806 = max)
28 videos · 2.1M views
4.1/6
AI Legibility
3.70%avg
eng. rate
Low legibility (below 3.0)
Mid legibility (3.0–3.9)
Higher legibility (4.0+)
89.6%
Four Seasons mentions are AI-invisible
46%
higher AI score for lower-volume brands
270
owned-channel videos across all brands (1.7%)